Important Quotes

From the 2018 report ‘Re-Inventing Wires: The Future of
Landlines and Networks’ written by Timothy Schoechle PhD, Senior Research Fellow, National Institute for Science, Law and Public Policy (
‘The unstated industry motive is to force subscribers into more profitable wireless
networks. The claims about obsolescence and the supposed need to “step toward to the 21st century” are a self-serving, false narrative put forward by monopolistic corporations and their political lackeys.’
‘Wireless access has been artificially inflated by regulatory disparity. Present technology and a market trajectory of dependence on wireless are unsustainable as a long-term solution for many reasons, including: • Not efficient (energy or materials) • Not sufficient (economically or in performance) • Not self-sufficient (energy or materials) • Not sustainable (economically, in energy, environmentally, socially) • Vulnerable (hacking) • Growing health concerns’
‘Wired infrastructure is inherently more future-proof, more reliable, more sustainable, more energy-efficient, and more essential to many other services. Wireless networks and services are inherently more complex, more costly, more unstable, and more constrained.’

Dr Martin Pall,  “You do not put out EMFs without doing safety testing. It is an atrocity to do that.”

Dr Magda Havas: ”If it was a real problem I would know, if it was a real problem the government would protect us, how come I’m not hearing about this? These are
all things I’ve heard when I’m giving seminars. They say, ‘oh, yeah? If this was really a problem they’d have told us’. I am they. I am a legitimate scientist and I am telling you.”

Dr Devra Davis, epidemiologist, ”We’re seeing tumours in the hearing nerve, we’re seeing tumours on the cheek, we’re seeing tumours in the brain right around the area, and we’re seeing tumours on the side of the head where people most often hold their ‘phone. … this is a very, very serious problem and we had better get serious about addressing it.”

Dr Jack Kruse, neurosurgeon and EMF effects researcher: ”5G is going to be the biggest assault on the human race ever seen…. It’s amazing to me, every day, how much I learn about what engineers are doing to electromagnetic waves to bring 5G to obedient idiots who want to watch Netflix faster. It just is shocking what they’re doing.”

Dr David Carpenter, ”The movement to higher frequencies involves higher energies and therefore we’re concerned that it’s going to result in greater health hazards to human than our current technology, which already we’re showing is associated with increases in certain kinds of cancer, in certain levels of effects in the nervous system.” 

Kevin Mottus, ”5G is going to require a transmitter for every three to ten houses, so we’re talking about a small cell tower placed in front of your home.” (Mottus says that they will emit frequencies between 24 – 90GHz, going much higher than I indicated in my previous emails.) 

”We are literally microwave radiating our population and we’re wondering why there’s so much cancer and chronic illness. ..We already know the lower frequencies cause cancer and neurological problems. We expect this to be much worse, much quicker. We are literally experimenting with people’s lives. .. We need to start pushing back and stop allowing them to use us literally like rats in an experiment. … 56 billion dollars to roll out 5G (in the US), zero money to look at the health effects. That should alarm people.”

The industry on 5G:  Tom Wheeler, (then) FCC Chair and former senior lobbyist CTIA, ”Unlike some countries, we do not believe that we should spend the next couple of years studying what 5G should be or how it should operate The future has a way of inventing itself. Turning innovators loose is far preferable to expecting committees and regulators to define the future. We won’t wait for standards. … Tens of billions of dollars in economic activity… and that’s damned important.”

Dr Paul Heroux, ”As Tom Wheeler from the FCC says, it’s a lot better to let these innovators loose and fill the surface of the earth six metres and deeper with microprocessors thereby slaughtering the human race out of oblivion than to risk losing a profit.”

Dr Erica Mallery-Blythe, ”The precautionary principle is outdated now, it’s overdue and protection is an emergency.” (Not that even the precautionary principle is being applied)

Dr Erica Mallery-Blythe,’‘Some people are left in disbelief really, and think that this can’t be true. If it was true, then somebody would be telling us. We don’t need to look back very far to see that the public were not warned in a timely fashion before.”

Dr Devra Davis, ‘After all, I reasoned, cell phones must be safe. Some of those complaining about health problems had the intense passion about the matter that one tends to dismiss as not credible. If there were really any serious problems, I reasoned, the governments of the world would not blithely underwrite the global spread of this technology. Having spent the past six years learning what some have known for four decades, I now understand I was mistaken.’

Camilla Rees, ‘’This is about saying ”no” to EMF pollution and to the many forms of corruption that are driving it in media, government, universities, associations and the false front non-profits that have official sounding names of good but are actually fronts for industry. There are many aspects of deception and deflection and actions not aligned with the greater good built into this issue.’’

George Carlo PhD, ”Had there been pre-market testing, mobile phones would never have made it into the market place.”

Joel M Moskowitz PhD,:  ‘‘We were sort of caught in a difficult place because some of the claims that were being made about health effects were so severe that had there been premarket testing, cell phones would never have made it into the market place.”

Wendy Mesley, television host and reporter, talking to Dr Devra Davis in The Secret Inside Your Cellphone – CBC Marketplace: ”Franz Adlkofer was shocked when results came back showing genetic damage, damage that was 10 times more likely with the new, more powerful, 3G.’ How does that translate into the genetic damage 4G and 5G (in concert with 2G and 3G) frequencies could potentially cause?”

Dr Pall writes: … ‘The European Commission has done nothing to protect European citizens from the very serious health hazards and the U.S. FDA, EPA and National Cancer Institute have done nothing to protect U.S. citizens. The U.S. FCC has been worse than that, acting in wanton disregard for our health.’

Camilla Rees, ‘’The overarching concern is, of course, that we are on a trajectory that presents an extinction risk for humans as well as the eco-system. Further wireless technologies like the 5G antennas plan will almost certainly accelerate our demise.”

Dr Martin Pall, ‘Let me close, as follows. There have been certain points in our history where people have stood up to strong destructive forces against what often appeared to be insurmountable odds. Those people are THE most honored people in our history. The people who failed to do so are among the most despised people in our history. I am not at all sure we will have historians to record us 100 years from now or even 30 years from now, given the direction in which we are heading. But if we do, rest assured that these are the standards by which we will all be judged.’

%d bloggers like this:
search previous next tag category expand menu location phone mail time cart zoom edit close